🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an observance that began as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has taken on a corporate feel, expanding to include functions where individuals of African heritage are paid to talk to predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The tide has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since that time, focusing less on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the month is celebrated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it progresses is a good lesson in how co-option leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the recent season we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels emboldened to state that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. At the same time, far-right parties are expanding in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the United States, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, often successfully, to the highest courts of the state. A drive to erase African American heritage and narrative from the historical documents is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration represents how minimally it can be influential if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content festivities of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the conditions of the current era. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is needed. An academic expert, a professor at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month altogether, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an time that has been ineffective.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an foundation that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as various establishments are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not evade politics, and leaves space for individuals, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What value has simple recognition of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Institutions who celebrate it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and alertness to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the dangers that impact society if anti-racism is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and adaptive. Maybe an total re-identification is necessary – Black History is Now Month.