🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to reinitiate atomic talks with Washington as long as it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

The Iranian diplomat declared exclusively dialogue produced results, and revealed new appeals had been made by mediators to reopen talks with the American leadership. He said Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Tehran was not yet able to authorize the global atomic watchdog to visit attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is treading a complex route since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be proceeding from a position of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged more resilient defensively and emotionally from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material within its borders that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Previous Negotiations Abruptly Terminated

The prior phases of discussions between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that culminated with the US president claiming the facilities had been destroyed. Following this, Western states exercised their privilege to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was agreed an local partnership with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the talks that US nuclear scientists could function on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Officials stated repeatedly they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the agreement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Current Position

Iran's diplomats stated the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the offer could be resurrected in certain ways if talks resume.

The American leader in recent days stated he had been receiving messages that Iran desired to restart talks, but in private Iran's diplomats state they are not yet receiving coherent offers from America either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran says diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his speech to the conference, aimed to portray the US as a dominant force that exploits the idea of global regulations, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict showed the conflict could not be ended by armed force. He said the assaults started with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and concluded with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were carried out with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making trust difficult to restore.

Dialogue Continues the Final Resolution

The foreign minister declared: "It was not Iran that had fled dialogue; it was the United States and the Western nations that had always tried to dictate their demands during the talks. Negotiations can still be alive and stays the ultimate resolution to settle disputes, but its criteria, guidelines and principles must be adhered to."

"Provided that they address to the Iranian people with the language of respect and honor, they will get a reply in the equivalent approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of recovery and reconstruction, Araghchi claimed he was assured Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We learned many lessons from this conflict; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He added: "We managed to survive this war. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to obliterate, continues to exist. The installations and equipment, if damaged, will be restored; what is essential is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but failed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have grown stronger, more united, and more supportive of the government and the country in the face of this assault."