🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.